Research at the Great Lakes Center focuses on the ecology and ecosystems of the Great Lakes and their tributaries. GLC research scientists, affiliates at Buffalo State University, and collaborators from other institutions bring diverse areas of expertise to the Great Lakes. Such expertise enables scientists to provide policymakers with information, which in turn promotes more informed decisions about ways to protect water quality, support the survival of native species, manage nuisance invasive species, monitor harmful chemicals in the food web, and many more. Research also contributes to scientific understanding of the complex interactions that occur in aquatic ecosystems around the world.
Monitoring of benthic invertebrates in the Great Lakes
The EPA Great Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO) Biology Monitoring Program is designed to provide managers access to biological data on zooplankton and benthos to support decision-making. In collaboration with Cornell University, we collect benthos (Buffalo State), zooplankton, and chlorophyll data (Cornell University) across the five Great Lakes, analyze this data, and make it available to environmental and fisheries managers. In addition to an annual survey of 57 long-term stations, a much more detailed survey is conducted on each lake every 5 years with the Coordinated Science and Monitoring Initiative (CSMI). We participated in CSMI surveys in 2014 (Lake Erie), 2015 (Lake Michigan), 2016 (Lake Superior), 2017 (Lake Huron), 2018 (Lake Ontario), 2019 (Lake Erie), 2021 (Lake Michigan), 2022 (Lake Huron and Lake Superior), 2023 (Lake Ontario), 2024 (Lake Erie), and 2025 (Lake Michigan). Additional research projects include impact of dreissenids on the lower food web and benthic nepheloid layer, and development of remote sensing methods.
We identified benthic samples collected onboard the EPA R/V Lake Guardian from all the Great Lakes in 2012–2025 and submitted the data to GLNPO. These data are the basis for individual lake reports as well as reports for the State of the Great Lakes. Thus far, the results of the study have been published in over 35 papers, 15 reports, and were presented at regional and international meetings.
Seventeen years of GLNPO Biology Monitoring Program benthic data were analyzed by Burlakova et al. (Burlakova et al., 2018) to reveal temporal and spatial trends in benthic community structure across the lakes. In 2018, we published a Special Issue containing 18 papers in the Journal of Great Lake Research (“U.S. EPA GLNPO Long-Term Monitoring of the Laurentian Great Lakes: Approaches, achievements and lessons learned,” Eds. Burlakova, L., A. Karatayev, L. Rudstam, and E. Hinchey). Some of the publications and reports of the 2014-2021 CSMI benthic surveys are available in Publications.
Check out this video of a nighttime ponar grab, taken during August 2013 while our researchers were aboard the R/V Lake Guardian. (Video credit: US EPA.)
Great Lakes Benthic Invertebrate Guide
Using the data and images from the EPA Long-term Biological Monitoring Program, CSMI, and DNA Barcode Reference Library project, we are creating a digital reference guide to the benthic species found in the Great Lakes.
New method for rapid assessment of dreissenid mussel populations
The Great Lakes Center, in collaboration with the U.S. EPA’s Great Lakes Biology Monitoring Program and Office of Research and Development-Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, has developed a new method for rapid assessment of dreissenid mussel populations in lakes. The method uses a Benthic Imaging System (BIS) to estimate population size of these invaders in near-real time during a typical 2-week summer cruise of the EPA research vessel Lake Guardian. The BIS consists of Go-Pro cameras and lights mounted to a steel frame that is lowered to the lakebed from a ship. The resulting bottom images are analyzed via imaging software to estimate mussel density and percent coverage. The new method substantially reduces the time required to map distributions of dreissenid mussels across large spatial scales compared to traditional sediment collection methods. This increase in spatial resolution and reporting times of monitoring is especially important considering that the quagga mussel is now now one of the major drivers of the ecosystem processes in the lower four Great Lakes. This method for Dreissena rapid assessment was applied in Lake Erie in 2019, Lake Michigan in 2021, Lake Huron in 2022, Lake Ontario in 2023, Lake Erie in 2024, and Lake Michigan in 2025, and will be applied in future surveys as a valuable addition to conventional bottom grab monitoring. Results of these studies were already published in two papers and presented at multiple international meetings. This method is now used for quagga mussel monitoring in deep Swiss lakes Constance and Biel (Haltiner et al., 2022). The research paper Rapid assessment of Dreissena population in Lake Erie using underwater videography is published online with @SpringerNature in Hydrobiologia.
News articles: Newsletter #14: GLC hosted CSMI 2019 Lake Erie workshop; Newsletter #15: GLC hosts scholars from Poland; Newsletter #15: CSMI Lake Erie Survey 2019; Great Lakes Center, EPA Collaborate on New Imaging Tool; Great Lakes Restoration: "New method for rapid assessment of quagga and zebra mussel populations"; Newsletter #16: CSMI 2020 Lake Michigan workshop; Newsletter #18: Planning summer 2021 benthic surveys in Lakes Michigan and Superior; Newsletter #19: The GLC returns to the R/V Lake Guardian; Newsletter #19: Lake Michigan benthos sampling; Newsletter #20: Great Lakes Center continues monitoring benthos of all Great Lakes; Newsletter #20: State of Lake Erie meeting; Newsletter #21: CSMI Lake Huron survey on Canadian boat; Newsletter #23: Benthic Palooza in Lake Ontario; Newsletter #24: Use of videography to assess round goby densities in the Great Lakes; Newsletter #24: The New Zealand mud snail newly detected in Lake Huron; Newsletter #25: Exploring Lake Erie: Great Lakes scientists conduct CSMI survey; Newsletter #27: Exploring Lake Michigan: Great Lakes scientists conduct CSMI survey
Benthoscapes
Images from side-looking Benthic Imaging System (BIS) cameras used for rapid assessment of dreissenid populations during CSMI surveys are also used to assess spatial distribution of benthos and Mysis. Communities of benthic macroinvertebrates are among the most useful indicators for biological assessment of environmental and anthropogenic stressors, but both sample processing and species identification are time-intensive, often requiring several years to identify all samples from a large-scale survey. Mapping benthic landscape or “benthoscape” structure and dynamics using underwater video can provide valuable and cost-effective assessment of bottom habitats on large spatial scales with minimal habitat disturbance.
In 2019, during the CSMI benthic survey in Lake Erie, we used this approach to characterize benthic habitats, and then tested whether visual classification could serve as an indicator of hypoxia (Burlakova et al., 2023). We identified four habitat types that differed significantly in near-bottom dissolved oxygen concentration and confirmed that video analysis can provide a quick and reliable method to detect habitats affected by periodic hypoxia. Video identification of benthoscapes may be important for regional monitoring of over 20 hypoxic zones documented in the Great Lakes where the extent and magnitude of hypoxia currently represent a major knowledge gap. We used this method to detect hypoxic habitats in 2022 on Saginaw Bay of Lake Huron, and in 2023 on Hamilton Bay of Lake Ontario. The results of this study have been recently published in Ecological Indicators.
New articles: Newsletter #15: CSMI Lake Erie Survey 2019; Great Lakes Center, EPA Collaborate on New Imaging Tool; Great Lakes Restoration: "New method for rapid assessment of quagga and zebra mussel populations"; Newsletter #21: CSMI Lake Huron survey on Canadian boat; Newsletter #23: Sampling Hamilton Harbor
Benthos of the Laurentian Great Lakes: Inventory of lake-wide surveys
Over 110 lake-wide benthic surveys were conducted on the Laurentian Great Lakes since 1929. However, these studies often are not readily available, and have never been combined in one dataset to preserve historic data. According to our estimations, primary data for at least 20% of all surveys are incomplete or have already been lost. For over five years, the Great Lakes Center has been conducting an inventory of benthic surveys for all the Great Lakes to create a database with all the available information on species composition, distribution, density, and biomass of benthic invertebrates. Considering the rarity of long-term benthic studies in lake ecosystems, this data set could be useful to explore effects of different environmental factors and exotic species on community organization, and for monitoring of water quality, biodiversity, exotic species introduction, fish food base assessment, and other ecosystem services provided by benthic community. Our first complete dataset on the Lake Ontario benthic community includes taxonomic data to the species level for 11 of the surveys and data to the group level for another two surveys covering the last 54 years, and was published as a data paper in Ecology (Burlakova et al., 2022). We also summarized 90 years of benthic research in Lake Erie (Karatayev et al., 2022; Burlakova et al., 2024), and 50 years of changes in the benthic community of Lake Superior (Burlakova et al., 2026). The next paper summarizing over 70 years of data on Lake Huron is currently under review at the Journal of Great Lakes Research, and the data paper is in preparation for submission to Ecology.
News articles: Newsletter #18: Long-term benthic data revealed large changes in Lake Ontario ecosystem
BODENSEE in STRESS - Modelling the consequences of climate change and invasive species for the Lake Constance ecosystem as a basis for integral management: The impact of serial invasion of dreissenids on lake ecosystems

This is a large collaborative project involving over 15 scientists from multiple institutions in North America and Europe. Within this project we synthesized decadal time series across seven lake ecosystems to resolve shared changes in seven key ecosystem features following invasion by zebra mussels and subsequent invasion by quagga mussels. These two congeners are among the most widespread invasive species that re-engineer and increasingly co-invade freshwater ecosystems. Seven polymictic shallow lakes with long-term data sets revealed remarkably similar trends, with the strongest ecosystem impacts occurring within 5-10 years of zebra mussel invasion. Surprisingly, plankton communities then exhibited a partial, significant recovery. This recovery was absent, and impacts of initial invasion amplified, in four lakes were quagga mussels outcompeted zebra mussels and more completely depleted phytoplankton. Next, we added data on deep stratified lakes to address the following hypotheses: (1) In stratified lakes quagga mussels form higher lake-wide density than zebra mussels and therefore their ecosystem impact will be stronger. Alternatively, as the bulk of quagga mussel population in stratified lake is located below thermocline and is isolated from the surface waters for most of the growing season, their impact on planktonic communities may be lower than zebra mussels, while profundal benthic community may be more strongly affected by quagga mussels. (2) In contrast to polymictic lakes, in stratified lakes it takes much longer for quagga mussels to reach population maximum and therefore the maximum ecosystem impacts will be delayed. In 2024-2026, we assembled high-resolution data sets spanning 18 North American and European invaded lakes and five key ecosystem variables and found that impacts manifest earlier in polymictic than in stratified lakes. Our results indicated that lake size is more important than other parameters in determining Dreissena impact. The paper “Larger lakes are hit harder and longer by Dreissena invasion” by Karatayev et al. is currently under review in Biological Invasions.
News articles: Newsletter #22: Times scales of ecosystem impacts and recovery under individual and serial invasions; Newsletter #24: Collaboration on quagga mussel study in Europe; Achievements: Lyubov Burlakova, Senior Research Scientist, and Alexander Karatayev, Director, Great Lakes Center; Newsletter #26: Working in Switzerland; Newsletter #26: Photos from sabbatical
Spatial self-organization of Dreissena populations in the Great Lakes
Dreissenid mussels dominate benthic biomass in many areas of the Laurentian Great Lakes and substantially affect nutrient cycling, water clarity, habitat structure, and food web pathways. Although their distribution, density, and biomass have been extensively studied, little is known about the spatial organization of mussel beds and the environmental factors controlling colony formation and aggregation.
We are using long-term underwater video collected during the Great Lakes Biology Monitoring Program and Coordinated Science and Monitoring Initiative surveys to quantify the spatial structure of Dreissena populations in Lakes Erie, Michigan, Huron, and Ontario. Preliminary analyses of video data from Lakes Michigan and Ontario showed that Dreissena were strongly aggregated across large lake areas. The largest colonies occurred at intermediate depths, where mussel abundance was also highest. Abundance peaked at approximately 60 m in Lake Michigan and 52 m in Lake Ontario. Sites with very low near-bottom current velocities generally had smaller colonies. Comparison with hydrodynamic model outputs for Lake Michigan indicated that colony size and aggregation may be related to current velocity and bottom shear stress. These results suggest that moderate near-bottom currents may create favorable conditions for feeding and the formation of large mussel colonies.
We are expanding this analysis across lakes, basins, depths, and years by measuring patch size, colony structure, percent cover, and aggregation. These characteristics will be compared with substrate, Dreissena density and biomass, water quality, food availability, and hydrodynamic conditions. The study will determine how the spatial organization of Dreissena populations varies among Great Lakes with different productivity, hydrodynamics, and invasion histories. Incorporating spatial structure into underwater video analysis may improve assessments of Dreissena population status and provide a better understanding of mussel-driven habitat modification and long-term ecosystem change. This follows "Spatial organization of dreissenid mussels (2022)."
Zebra fish colony establishment
This project is led by research scientist Nikolai Barulin and Interim Director Pennuto. Zebra fish (Danio rerio) are a valuable vertebrate model for a wide range of investigations, from genetic to ecosystem. They have particularly common use in cellular biology and ecotoxicology. The project obtained its IACUC approval in spring 2026 and has ironed out rearing, feeding, and mating protocols to build a sustainable supply of wild-type fish. This colony will allow GLC staff to expand collaborations with colleagues in the region.
Partnership for Regional Invasive Species Management

The Western New York Partnership for Regional Invasive Species Management (WNY PRISM) works to address invasive species priorities using a coordinated partnership for which we provide leadership, technical assistance, and opportunities for collaboration. Our goal is to improve, restore, and protect local aquatic and terrestrial resources by improving the effectiveness of invasive species management efforts, engaging the public in management actions, and increasing awareness of invasive species issues throughout the eight-county Western New York region. To achieve established goals, WNY PRISM coordinates several high profile and priority programs that address all aspects of the invasive species management needs of the region by forming strategic partnerships, developing resources and increasing regional capacity. WNY PRISM runs a robust Early Detection and Response Program, several Community Science Programs (Trail Survey, Hemlock Woolly Adelgid Hunters/Stand Assessments, Spotted Lanternfly Trap Monitoring), a Crew Assistance Program that sees WNY PRISM work with dozens of partners across the region each year, and a Watercraft Inspection Stewardship Program with up to 15 Boat Stewards. This is in addition to expansive education and outreach, data collection, and information management efforts. For more information WNY PRISM activities and results, you can find our Annual Report at www.wnyprism.org.
News articles: SUNY Buffalo State Receives $1.1 Million Grant for Invasive Species Management; Newsletter #2: Growing the Great Lakes Center; Newsletter #2: PRISM on the Move; Newsletter #2: Invasive species of note; Newsletter #3: In the news; Invasive Species Management Office Opened, Coordinator Named; Newsletter #4: Growing the Great Lakes Center; Newsletter #4: Early detection, rapid response key to controlling invasives; New York Invasive Species Awareness Week; WNY PRISM coordinator interviewed on WGRZ for Invasive Species Awareness Week; Buffalo State Experts: Invasive Species Management; Newsletter #5: A summer of education, outreach and invasive species management; Newsletter #5: In Other News...; Newsletter #5: Invasive Species Spotlight: Pale Swallow-wort (Cynanchum rossicum); WNY PRISM Provides Education, Outreach, and Invasive Species Management; WNY PRISM newsletter released; WNY PRISM Plans Invasive Species Awareness Week Activities; Newsletter #7: Chautauqua Lake outlet survey; Newsletter #7: WNY PRISM collects purple loosestrife beetles; WNY PRISM Tackles Land, Water Invaders; Newsletter #9: Early detection protocol for invasive species in Western New York; Invasive Species Awareness Week: What's Wrong with Honeysuckle?; Newsletter #11: Integrated Pest Management; Newsletter #12: Invasive species spotlight: Slender false brome; Newsletter #12: WNY PRISM continues to grow; Newsletter #13: WNY PRISM refunded for 5 years; Pennuto Awarded PRISM Grant; Newsletter #14: Introducing WNY PRISM's expanded watercraft inspection program; Newsletter #15: Boat Steward Progress Report; Newsletter #15: 2019 Field Notes: eDNA Sampling; Newsletter #16: Rails to Trails Pathway Project; Newsletter #20: Swallow-wort Biocontrol Research and Outreach Group; Volunteer Opportunity with WNY PRISM: August 20, September 10; Newsletter #21: Battling invasive species in a quiet wooded neighborhood; Newsletter #21: Spotted lanternfly spotted in WNY PRISM region!; Newsletter #23: Celebrating 10 years of the WNY PRISM Crew Assistance Program!; Newsletter #25: Invasive species management and native plant restoration go together like fall and pumpkin spice; Conservation Conversations: Managing Invasive Species - Dr. Chris Pennuto; Newsletter #26: Water garden escape artists; After giant hogweed spotted at Como Lake Park, officials issue warning; Newsletter #27: Paddling ahead of the problem: Early detection efforts to protect our waterways;
Isolating reproduction pheromone for invasive red swamp crayfish
This is a funded project led by Interim Director Pennuto with co-PI’s Drs. Jinseok Heo and Sujit Suwal of the BSU Chemistry Department to identify a putative mating pheromone for invasive crayfish. Prior reviews of crustacean chemical communication indicate that potential signaling molecules range from peptides and proteins to small metabolites like nucleotides or sugar derivatives (Breithaupt and Thiel 2011). In Procambarus clarkii specifically, early physiological studies suggested the sex pheromone was likely a carbohydrate or polysaccharide (Ameyaw-Akumfi and Hazlett 1975). In contrast, recent untargeted metabolomic analyses have proposed chemically diverse candidate compounds, including steroid-like molecules such as mestranol (Zhou et al., 2023). This discrepancy, ranging from sugars to steroids, highlights that a narrowly targeted analytical strategy focused on a single compound class would risk overlooking the true bioactive signal.
Our group will employ an untargeted LC-Orbitrap mass spectrometry approach as the primary analytical platform. This strategy enables unbiased detection of dominant bioactive molecules across chemical classes, including peptides, nucleotides, and other highly polar metabolites, and supports accurate identification of the pheromonal signaling molecule in this invasive species.
Invasive crayfish management
Interim Director Pennuto has several small projects to assess a range of invasive crayfish management tools. Recently, a small pond in the region was invaded by red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii). This invasive crayfish has had significant food web impacts in other locations it has invaded, leading to loss of littoral macrophyte beds and changes in fish communities. Intensive trapping efforts were the first management application, removing nearly 3000 crayfish in three years. Mark-recapture and catch per unit effort data suggested the population size had been reduced, though not eliminated by these efforts.
The pond has no piscivorous fish present. In Spring 2025, twenty 10-12 inch largemouth bass were introduced into the system to supplement the intensive trapping efforts. Summer 2026 catch data will be compared to previous years to assess this introduction. Additionally, there is a small artificial stream entering the pond as part of a recirculating system for the complex. The stream was dewatered in the winter of 24/25 and 25/26 in an effort to freeze out populations in the stream. Catch data in summer 2026 will be compared to previous years to assess dewatering impacts. We will continue to monitor crayfish population response to these management efforts. (Previously "The response of red swamp crayfish to intensive trapping (2022-2024)," and "Combining intensive trapping and largemouth bass introduction to control red swamp crayfish (2024-2025)."
News articles: Newsletter #21: Crayfish battles in Amherst; Newsletter #23: Invasive crayfish management finds first native species!
Native crayfish culturing
Competitive niche replacement occurs when one species having a large degree of niche overlap with similar species outcompetes rivals in an area. This outcome may be more prevalent following a species invasion. Locally, red swamp crayfish have invaded two locations in Western New York and are becoming the dominant species in the two habitats. Research suggests that native crayfish populations might be able to remain dominant in their local habitats if their population size is large enough. We are creating a laboratory culture of native White River crayfish (Procambarus acutus acutus) for potential release to locations where they have been on the decline since the arrival of red swamp crayfish as a management tool to assist native population decline.
Implementation of the Great Lakes Observing System

The Great Lakes Center operates two weather/data buoys: one outside of Buffalo and the other off the coast of Dunkirk, NY. These buoys are part of the Great Lakes Observing System (GLOS) and provide real-time wave, weather, and water conditions to a diverse set of users, spring through fall.
We first deployed the Dunkirk Buoy in 2011. Over the years, the buoy has changed with advances in remote sensing technology, from using a smaller buoy body for easier deployment to upgraded sensors that are better able to measure environmental conditions. The Dunkirk Buoy is a NexSens CB-650 data buoy located 6 nautical miles NW of Dunkirk, New York, in the eastern basin of Lake Erie, in approximately 100 feet of water. The above-water sensor array includes a weather station measuring air temperature, windspeed/direction, solar radiation, relative humidity, and atmospheric pressure. In addition, a wave sensor mounted just above the waterline measures wave height, direction, and period. Below the surface of the water, a thermistor string is suspended with temperature nodes every 6.6 ft (2 m) down to 79 ft (24 m). At 82 ft (25 m), a YSI multiparameter instrument measures dissolved oxygen, temperature, and conductivity.
Recognizing the need for real-time data and the many benefits it would bring to the Buffalo waterfront, we sought funding for a new weather/data buoy. In Fall 2025, the Niagara River Greenway Ecological Standing Committee approved funding from the New York Power Authority for the purchase and initial operation of this new remote sensing system. The buoy was purchased in early 2026 and its maiden deployment was May 26. The Buffalo Buoy is a NexSens CB-650 data buoy located 2 nautical miles SSW of Buffalo, New York, in the eastern basin of Lake Erie in approximately 40 feet of water. The above-water sensor array includes a webcam and weather station measuring air temperature, windspeed/direction, solar radiation, relative humidity and atmospheric pressure. In addition, a wave sensor mounted just above the waterline measures wave height, direction, and period. Just below the water’s surface a YSI multiparameter instrument measures chlorophyl, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, and temperature. Down deeper, a thermistor string is suspended in the water column measuring temperature at intervals of 6.6 ft (2 m).
The information collected from these buoys and from the whole GLOS system can be used for climate modeling, lake current and energy budget modeling, as well as being useful for the study of nutrient dynamics and fisheries. The system is also useful for commercial and recreational navigation by providing real time information regarding wind and wave conditions. In the summer of 2012, buoy evidence was used to help explain a fish kill.
Eastern Lake Erie Weather/Data Buoys website
News article: Awards: September 2010; Top-Notch Research Leads to Increased Funding, More Projects at Great Lakes Center; Six GLC Posters Presented at Annual Fall Forum; Newsletter #1: Great Lakes Center Buoys; Newsletter #1: View from the water's edge; Newsletter #1: Buoy evidence may explain summertime fish kill; Newsletter #17: Popular GLOS buoy receives an upgrade; Newsletter #23: Field Station Snapshots; Newsletter #25: Dunkirk Buoy named 'Buoy of September'; Newsletter #25: Happy Retirement, Mark!; Environmental Monitor: Monitoring Lake Erie’s Eastern Basin: Building Long-Term Data and Real-Time Public Solutions; Achievements: Brian Haas, Field and Lab Research Technician, Great Lakes Center; Five things to know about Buffalo State's Great Lakes Center; Newsletter #27: Happenings at the Field Station; Environmental Monitor: Buffalo’s New Data Buoy Tracks Lake Erie’s Extreme Weather; Newsletter #28: New Buffalo buoy updates; Dunkirk Observer: Federal cuts spill into lake monitoring; Buffalo News: New weather buoy coming to Lake Erie a 'no-brainer'; Achievements: Brian Haas, Field Station Manager, Ben Szczygiel, Research Technician, Great Lakes Center; Faculty/Staff Achievements Roundup: Thering receives SUNY Online Effective Practice AwardFaculty/Staff Achievements Roundup: Thering receives SUNY Online Effective Practice Award; Your May Update from the Great Lakes Observing System: The Buoy(s) of May, Buffalo State University - Dunkirk and Buffalo Buoys
Photo galleries: First deployment of the buoy; Old method for deploying the GLOS buoy; Low water affects boat launching in Dunkirk; Deploying the GLOS buoy; Retrieving the buoy 2018










